Shusaku Endo’s Silence is a haunting meditation on faith, betrayal, and the unbearable quiet of God in the face of suffering. His Jesuit protagonist, Father Rodrigues, is torn between the demands of conscience and the silence of heaven as he watches Japanese Christians endure unspeakable torture. The novel’s brilliance lies in its emotional honesty: it doesn’t provide easy answers, only a kind of trembling compassion that returns again in Endo’s later work, Deep River.
And yet, there’s another way to face this silence—one that doesn’t require the framework of a God who speaks at all. A way offered not by a theologian, but by a 17th-century philosopher: Baruch Spinoza.
目次
The Problem with Silence
Endo’s spiritual world is one in which God is supposed to intervene—or at least respond. The silence is devastating precisely because it violates the expectation of relationship. If God is love, where is that love when His people are trampled?
Endo’s final move in Deep River is toward a kind of pan-religious compassion—a sense that love persists even when God does not act. But this still clings to a theological psychology of absence, where God is just out of reach, painfully watching.
Spinoza offers something else entirely.
A God Who Does Not Speak—Because God Is Everything
For Spinoza, God is not a person. God does not make decisions, test faith, or withhold grace. God is Nature itself—the whole unfolding order of causes and effects, in which every event, from the blooming of a flower to the suffering of a martyr, is part of an eternal and necessary logic.
“Nothing happens in Nature which can be attributed to a defect in it.” (Ethics, III, Preface)
There is no silence because there is no expectation of speech. The universe does not withhold love or justice because it was never offering them in the first place—not in the personal, anthropomorphic sense.
This view may seem cold, even cruel, but it also frees us from the crushing burden of theodicy. We no longer need to ask why God allowed a child to suffer, or why the faithful are abandoned. We understand instead that all things—including tragedy—flow from the same necessary order that gives rise to joy, clarity, and peace.
The Ethical Response: Not Faith, but Understanding
Endo’s protagonists struggle with guilt, betrayal, and redemption. In Spinoza’s world, these categories soften into something else: emotional clarity born of intellectual understanding.
The ethical life is not a matter of pleasing God or fulfilling duty under duress. It is a matter of coming to see the world as it is: vast, lawful, impersonal—and in that very impersonality, profoundly beautiful. It is to transform passive suffering into active understanding.
This is not escapism. It is not indifference. It is what Spinoza calls amor Dei intellectualis—the intellectual love of God: a love of the whole, not because it spares us suffering, but because it includes even our suffering as part of something infinitely coherent.
Beyond Silence
So yes, Endo’s Silence is powerful. But a Spinozistic answer doesn’t merely sit with the silence—it dissolves it. It asks us not to wait for God’s voice, but to recognize that everything is already speaking, if only we can see the causal web that binds all things.
This vision may not offer comfort in the traditional sense. But it does offer freedom—not from suffering, but from confusion. And perhaps in the long arc of evolution and thought, that too is a kind of grace.